4.7 Article

Thermochemical interactions between CMAS and Ca2Y8(SiO4)6O2 apatite environmental barrier coating material

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 39, 期 16, 页码 5380-5390

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.08.040

关键词

Apatite; CMAS; Cyclosilicate; Environmental barrier coating (EBC); Electron microscopy; X-ray diffraction

资金

  1. NASA's Transformative Tools and Technologies(TTT) Project within the Transformative Aeronautics Concept Program (TACP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermochemical interactions between Ca2Y8(SiO4)(6)O-2 apatite, a potential environmental barrier coating (EBC) material, and a synthetic CMAS having the composition 23.3 CaO - 6.4 MgO - 3.1 Al2O3 - 62.5 SiO2 - 4.1 Na2O - 0.5 K2O - 0.04 Fe2O3 mole % were investigated. Pellets of apatite + CMAS powder and hot-pressed apatite discCMAS couples were annealed at 1200-1500 degrees C for 1-50 hours in air. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to identify the phases present. Polished cross-sections of the heat treated pellets and diffusion couples were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high angle annular dark field (HAADF) imaging, selected area electron diffraction (SAED), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Ca3Y2(Si3O9)(2) cyclosilicate, apatite, and amorphous phases were present in the samples heat treated at 1200 and 1300 degrees C, whereas no cyclosilicate was detected in samples annealed at 1400 and 1500 degrees C. A distinct cyclosilicate layer was observed at the apatite-CMAS interface in the diffusion couples heat treated at 1200 and 1300 degrees C. However, at 1400 and 1500 C, due to its much lower viscosity, CMAS quickly infiltrated the apatite substrate through pores and along the grain boundaries and no cyclosilicate was observed; the apatite grains dissolved in molten CMAS followed by re-precipitation of apatite needles within an amorphous phase on cooling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据