4.5 Article

Mass Spectrometric Detection and Characterization of Metabolites of Gemini Surfactants Used as Gene Delivery Vectors

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jasms.9b00004

关键词

Gemini surfactants; gene delivery; metabolites; high-resolution mass spectrometry; efficiency and toxicity; Q-Exactive

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. NSERC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gemini surfactants are a class of lipid molecules that have been successfully used in vitro and in vivo as nonviral gene delivery vectors. However, the biological fate of gemini surfactants has not been well investigated. In particular, the metabolism of gemini surfactants after they enter cells as gene delivery vehicles is unknown. In this work, we used a high-resolution quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometry (Q-Exactive) instrument to detect the metabolites of three model gemini surfactants, namely, (a) unsubstituted (16-3-16), (b) with pyridinium head groups (16(Py)-S-2-S-16(Py)), and (c) substituted with a glycyl-lysine dipeptide (16-7N(GK)-16). The metabolites were characterized, and structures were proposed, based on accurate masses and characteristic product ions. The metabolism of the three gemini surfactants was very different as 16-3-16 was not metabolized in PAM 212 cells, whereas 16(Py)-S-2-S-16(Py) was metabolized primarily via phase I reactions, including oxidation and dealkylation, producing metabolites that could be linked to its observed high toxicity. The third gemini surfactant 16-7N(GK)-16 was metabolized mainly via phase II reactions, including methylation, acetylation, glucose conjugation, palmityl conjugation, and stearyl conjugation. The metabolism of gemini surfactants provides insight for future directions in the design and development of more effective gemini surfactants with lower toxicity. The reported approach can also be applied to study the metabolism of other structurally related gemini surfactants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据