4.8 Article

Ultrathin Two-Dimensional Membranes Assembled by Ionic Covalent Organic Nanosheets with Reduced Apertures for Gas Separation

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 142, 期 9, 页码 4472-4480

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b13825

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation Singapore [NRF2018-NRF-ANR007 POCE-MON]
  2. Ministry of Education -Singapore (MOE AcRF Tier 1) [R-279-000-S40-114]
  3. Agency for Science, Technology and Research [IRG A1783c0015, IAF-PP A1789a0024]
  4. Ministry of Education -Singapore (MOE AcRF Tier 2) [MOE2018-T2-2-148]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are a promising category of porous materials possessing extensive chemical tunability, high porosity, ordered arrangements at a molecular level, and considerable chemical stability. Despite these advantages, the application of COFs as membrane materials for gas separation is limited by their relatively large pore apertures (typically >0.5 nm), which exceed the sieving requirements for most gases whose kinetic diameters are less than 0.4 nm. Herein, we report the fabrication of ultrathin two-dimensional (2D) membranes through layer-by-layer (LbL) assembly of two kinds of ionic covalent organic nanosheets (iCONs) with different pore sizes and opposite charges. Because of the staggered packing of iCONs with strong electrostatic interactions, the resultant membranes exhibit features of reduced aperture size, optimized stacking pattern, and compact dense structure without sacrificing thickness control, which are suitable for molecular sieving gas separation. One of the hybrid membranes, TpEBr@TpPa-SO3 Na with a thickness of 41 nm, shows a H-2 permeance of 2566 gas permeation units (GPUs) and a H-2/CO2 separation factor of 22.6 at 423 K, surpassing the recent Robeson upper bound along with long-term hydrothermal stability. This strategy provides not only a high-performance H-2 separation membrane candidate but also an inspiration for pore engineering of COF or 2D porous polymer membranes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据