4.5 Article

Effect of androgen excess and glucocorticoid exposure on metabolic risk profiles in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2019.105540

关键词

Congenital adrenal hyperplasia; 21-Hydroxylase deficiency; Blood pressure; Metabolism; Intima media thickness; Body composition

资金

  1. IFCAH grant 2013
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [325768017, 314061271-TRR205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data on cardiovascular morbidity in adults with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAN) is sparse. We therefore aimed to determine the role of androgen control and glucocorticoid therapy on metabolic health. For that purpose, we included 90 patients (N = 39 men, N = 51 women) with classic CAH due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency (N = 61 salt wasting, N = 29 simple virilizing) and an equal number of controls matched for age, sex, BMI and smoking-habits. We could show that there was no difference in intima-media-thickness between patients and controls and only one patient fulfilled all criteria of the metabolic syndrome. CAR men presented with an increased relative body fat mass in comparison to controls (25.6 % vs. 22.1 %; p = 0.011) while this was not true for CAH women. Body fat was lower in those taking hydrocortisone instead of synthetic glucocorticoids (B = -3.27; p = 0.048). While arterial hypertension was rare, 54 % of patients had an impaired systolic drop at night or were classified as non-dippers (17 %). Impaired dipping was not associated with evening glucocorticoid and fludrocortisone intake but mediated by sodium levels. Insulin resistance was more common in CAH women (B = 1.689; p = 0.036) and in those with poor androgen control (B = 0.823; p = 0.046). In summary, we could show that good cardiovascular health outcome in adult CAH patients can be achieved. Hydrocortisone is superior in terms of body composition. It is yet unclear how non-dipping will translate into cardiovascular morbidity in the long-term.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据