4.7 Article

Efficient automated extraction of local defect resonance parameters in fiber reinforced polymers using data compression and iterative amplitude thresholding

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION
卷 463, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.114958

关键词

Local defect resonance (LDR); Non-destructive testing (NDT); Fiber reinforced polymers; Automated defect detection

资金

  1. Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO) [1148018N]
  2. FWO [G0B9515N, G066618N, 12T5418N]
  3. SBO project DETECT-IV [160455]
  4. SIM (Strategic Initiative Materials in Flanders)
  5. VLAIO (Flemish government agency Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Local defect resonance (LDR) employs a specific high frequency, the LDR frequency, to get a localized strong resonant activation of the defect. However, one of the major difficulties for applying LDR as a non-destructive testing technique, is the proper identification of the required LDR frequency, and the subsequent LDR localization. In this study, post-processing methods in both time and frequency domain are applied to low-power broadband vibration data in view of automated extraction of LDR parameters, i.e. LDR frequency and LDR location. In order to reduce the computational effort for large datasets (>1 GB), various data compression methods have been considered: power spectral density (PSD), principal component analysis (PCA) and operational modal analysis (OMA). The actual LDR parameter extraction from the (compressed) data is based on an iterative procedure to threshold the vibrational amplitudes. The LDR parameter extraction procedure is demonstrated on different carbon fiber reinforced polymers with various defect types: flat bottom holes, inserts and low velocity impact damage. It is further demonstrated that the procedure can equally handle multiple defects. A comparison of the performance of the various data compression methods is provided. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据