4.5 Article

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of ulixertinib in rat by liquid chromatography combined with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 43, 期 7, 页码 1275-1283

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201901139

关键词

bioavailability; liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry; metabolic pathways; pharmacokinetics; ulixertinib

资金

  1. Nation Natural Science Foundation of China [81373454]
  2. Scientific Research Subject of Health Commission of Sichuan Province [18PJ540]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a simple and sensitive liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of ulixertinib in rat plasma. The plasma samples were precipitated with acetonitrile and then separated on a C-18 column with water containing 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile as mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Analytes were monitored on a TSQ Vantage triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer operated in positive electrospray ionization mode. Selected reaction monitoring transitions were m/z 433.1 -> 262.1 for ulixertinib and m/z 450.1 -> 260.1 for internal standard. The assay achieved good linearity over the concentration range of 0.1-1000 ng/mL with correlation coefficient > 0.9991. The validated assay has been successfully applied to pharmacokinetic study of ulixertinib in rat after oral and intravenous administration. The results revealed that ulixertinib showed high exposure in rat plasma, low clearance, moderate oral bioavailability (45.13%), and dose-independent pharmacokinetic profiles over the oral dose range of 1-15 mg/kg. In addition, six metabolites from rat plasma and hepatocytes were detected and structurally identified by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography combined with high-resolution mass spectrometry. The metabolic pathways of ulixertinib referred to hydroxylation and dealkylation and glucuronidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据