4.4 Article

Feedback Regulation in a Cancer Stem Cell Model can Cause an Allee Effect

期刊

BULLETIN OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY
卷 78, 期 4, 页码 754-785

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11538-016-0161-5

关键词

Cancer stem cell; Allee effect; Tumor extinction; Stable Manifold Theorem

资金

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NIH/NICHD) [T32HD060555]
  2. National Institute of Health, National Cancer Institute [P50GM76515, P30CA062203]
  3. National Science Foundation, Division of Mathematical Sciences
  4. NSERC
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1263796] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1263796] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The exact mechanisms of spontaneous tumor remission or complete response to treatment are phenomena in oncology that are not completely understood. We use a concept from ecology, the Allee effect, to help explain tumor extinction in a model of tumor growth that incorporates feedback regulation of stem cell dynamics, which occurs in many tumor types where certain signaling molecules, such as Wnts, are upregulated. Due to feedback and the Allee effect, a tumor may become extinct spontaneously or after therapy even when the entire tumor has not been eradicated by the end of therapy. We quantify the Allee effect using an 'Allee index' that approximates the area of the basin of attraction for tumor extinction. We show that effectiveness of combination therapy in cancer treatment may occur due to the increased probability that the system will be in the Allee region after combination treatment versus monotherapy. We identify therapies that can attenuate stem cell self-renewal, alter the Allee region and increase its size. We also show that decreased response of tumor cells to growth inhibitors can reduce the size of the Allee region and increase stem cell densities, which may help to explain why this phenomenon is a hallmark of cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据