4.7 Article

Proteomic Investigation of Tolerant Escherichia coli Populations from Cyclic Antibiotic Treatment

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 900-913

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00687

关键词

persistence; tolerance; antibiotic; adaptive laboratory evolution; proteomics; Escherichia coli

资金

  1. Research Grant Council [16100415, 16306417]
  2. Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme, of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Persisters are a subpopulation of cells that have enhanced abilities to survive antibiotics and other stressful conditions. Recently, it was found that when persisters were repeatedly regrown and retreated with the same antibiotic for several cycles, the new population will become tolerant to the drug. In this study, we applied such cyclic antibiotic treatment on Escherichia coli populations using different classes of antibiotics (ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, and apramycin) during the exponential phase. After a few cycles, we observed that the evolved populations exhibit high tolerance to the specific class of antibiotic used during the evolution experiments, which are achieved by single-point mutations in one or several genes. Interestingly, all evolved populations show multidrug tolerance at the stationary phase, indicating that they have higher triggered persister fraction. Proteomic analysis and cross-comparison of the regulated proteomes of the tolerant populations during the stationary phase identified protein candidates with similar expression profiles that might be important for the tolerance phenotype. Susceptibility tests of mutants lacking gene coding for these protein candidates showed that they have significantly reduced survival toward antibiotics not only during the stationary phase, but also during the exponential phase. We demonstrated how proteomics, combined with cyclic antibiotic treatment as a means to enrich tolerant populations, is a promising avenue to obtain fresh insights into the phenomenon of persistence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据