4.8 Article

Confining sulfur particles in clay nanotubes with improved cathode performance of lithium-sulfur batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 450, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227698

关键词

Lithium-sulfur batteries; Halloysites; Cathode; Lithium batteries; Nanotubes

资金

  1. ACS Petroleum Research Fund [58598-ND10]
  2. Louisiana Board of Regent (LEQSF) [(2019-20)-RD-D-07]
  3. Louisiana Harrelson Family Professorship
  4. Russian Science Foundation [19-79-30091]
  5. Russian Science Foundation [19-79-30091] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-Sulfur batteries have high energy storage capacity while their sulfur cathode suffers large volume change, polysulfides dissolution and shuttle effect, and capacity fading during long-term cycling. To help lock sulfur and mitigate these problems, we introduce halloysites, a natural clay material with nanotube format, to disperse and confine sulfur nanoparticles as well as to suppress the dissolution and migration of polysulfides. Halloysites are firstly made conductive by covering with a glucose-derived carbon skin. Sulfur nanoparticles are then trapped in both lumen and outside surface of individual nanotubes with a loading dosage up to 80 wt%. In this new halloysite/sulfur composites cathode, the hollow nanostructure of halloysites provides space to allow dimension changes of encapsulated sulfur nanoparticles during repeated lithiation while limit their size up to the diameter of nanotube lumen (i.e., 25 nm or less). The stacked halloysite clusters further create many nanoscale voids to divide the sulfur-electrolyte interface into isolated domains and increase the migration tortuosity in electrolytes to suppress the dissolution and shuttle effect of polysulfides. These features together contribute to improved cycling stability, retaining nearly similar to 84% of the starting capacity over 250 cycles, though the diffusion of lithium ions into and out of nanotubes show some differences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据