4.8 Article

Lithium ion battery electrodes predicted from manufacturing simulations: Assessing the impact of the carbon-binder spatial location on the electrochemical performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 444, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227285

关键词

Lithium ion battery; Carbon binder domain; Electrochemistry; Spatial heterogeneities; 4D-resolved computational modeling

资金

  1. European Union through the European Research Council [772873]
  2. Institut Universitaire de France
  3. European Union through the POROUS4APP project [686163]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [772873] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a novel computational simulation study of the performance of Lithium Ion Battery (LIB) NMC electrodes for different compositions. The novelty of this work relies on the explicit consideration with three-dimensional resolution of the Active Material (AM) and the Carbon-Binder Domains (CBD) resulting from simulations of the electrode manufacturing processes and considered as spatially separated phases. A multi-phase volumetric mesh is generated and imported into COMSOL Multiphysics using the INNOV meshing algorithm recently published by us. A 4D-resolved electrochemical model is then applied to simulate the electrochemical behavior of the electrode mesostructure upon LIB cell discharge. Several mesostructural parameters are extracted and the differences in the electrochemical response due to the variations of these parameters are investigated. Furthermore, the 4D-resolved electrochemical model allows assessing the impact of CBD spatial location and its transport properties towards Li+ on the overall electrochemical response, as well as identifying spatial operation heterogeneities inside the electrode. The model assesses then phenomena which are very difficult to investigate based only on experimental approaches, and it aims to become a useful complementary tool of them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据