4.8 Article

Three-dimensional Ni/Ni3Fe embedded boron-doped carbon nanotubes nanochain frameworks as highly efficient and durable electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 451, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227753

关键词

Ni/Ni3Fe/B-CNT electrocatalyst; Self-assembly hydrolysis method; Oxygen evolution reaction; Porous nanochain frameworks; Boron doping

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21773024, 51372033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electrocatalytic water splitting is still seriously hindered by the sluggish reaction kinetics, large overpotential, and high cost of oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalyst. To address such issues, herein, for the first time, three-dimensional porous Ni/Ni3Fe anchored boron-doped carbon nanotubes nanochain frameworks (Ni/Ni3Fe/B-CNT), constructed by ultrasmall Ni/Ni3Fe nanoparticles embedded in highly conductive B doped CNT chains, are synthesized via a facile self-assembly hydrolysis method and corresponding growth mechanism is revealed. The low-cost Ni/Ni3Fe/B-CNT hybrid delivers excellent OER performance outperforming that of well-established benchmark electrocatalysts (RuO2): it requires only 265 my to obtain a large current density of 10 mA cm(-2) (mass load similar to 0.28 mg cm(-2)); it shows a small Tafel slope of 62.9 mV dec(-1) and excellent long-term stability even after 40 h. The outstanding OER performance of Ni/Ni3Fe/B-CNT is mainly attributed to its unique porous nanoarchitecture with abundant active sites and the synergistic effect between the ultrathin Ni/ Ni3Fe nanoparticles and highly conductive B-doped CNT skeleton; these merits facilitate the electron/ion transfer and oxygen bubble release thus significantly improve its OER activity. This work presents a well-designed nanoarchitecture design and facile fabrication strategy to obtain nonprecious transition metal-based OER electrocatalysts with excellent efficiency and long-term stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据