4.8 Article

Investigation of lithium-ion battery degradation mechanisms by combining differential voltage analysis and alternating current impedance

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 448, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227575

关键词

Lithium-ion battery; Degradation mechanisms; Differential voltage analysis (dV/dQ); Impedance; Neutron powder diffraction; Correlation analysis

资金

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Postdoctoral Research Program
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51576142]
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [05K16VK2/05K19VK3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

18650-type cells with 2.5 Ah capacity are cycled at both 25 degrees C and 0 degrees C separately, and at 25 degrees C two charging protocols (constant current, and constant current-constant voltage charge) are used. Differential voltage analysis (dV/dQ) and alternating current (AC) impedance are mainly used to investigate battery degradation mechanisms quantitatively. The dV/dQ suggests that active cathode loss and loss of lithium inventory (LLI) are the dominating degradation factors. Significant microcracks are observed in the fatigued cathode particles from the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. Crystal structure parameters of selected fatigued batteries at fully charged state are determined by in sins high-resolution neutron powder diffraction. Obvious increases of ohmic resistance and solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) resistance occur when the battery capacity fade falls beneath 20%. Continuous charge transfer resistance and Warburg impedance coefficient (W-.eff) increase are observed in the course of cycling. Correlation analysis is performed to bridge the gap between material loss as well as LLI and impedance increase. The increase of the charge transfer resistance is related to both active cathode loss and LLI, and a functional relationship is revealed between LLI and W-.eff regardless of the used cycling protocols.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据