4.8 Article

Ultrathin g-C3N4/Mo:BiVO4 photoanode for enhanced photoelectrochemical water oxidation

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 444, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227300

关键词

BiVO4 photoanode; Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4); Heterojunction; Metal doping; PEC water oxidation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21706091]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [201804010400]
  3. Guangdong Provincial Department of Science and Technology Application Research and Development Supporting Special Fund Project [2015B020235007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A g-C3N4/Mo:BiVO4 (CMB) heterojunction photoanode is constructed with enhanced photoelectrochemical (PEC) water oxidation performance, in which ultrathin g-C3N4 is coated on Mo-doped BiVO4. CMB shows a remarkable water oxidation photocurrent of 3.11 mA cm(-2) at 1.23 V vs. RHE, which is 3.21 times higher than pristine BiVO4. The maximal incident photon-to-current efficiency (IPCE) reaches 45.5% at 430 nm and the applied bias photo-to-current efficiency (ABPE) reaches 0.74% at 0.78 V vs. RHE, which are 2.62 and 5.76 times compared with pristine BiVO4, respectively. The amounts of hydrogen and oxygen generated by CMB are 18.58 and 9.32 mu mol within 1 h, which are 4.66 and 5.51 times higher than pristine BiVO4. The significant enhancements are attributed to the improvement of charge separation and acceleration of oxygen evolution reaction (OER) kinetics. Mo-dopant enhances charge separation due to its excellent electron transfer capability. Ultrathin g-C3N4 also boosts charge separation via forming a heterojunction with Mo:BiVO4 and promotes OER kinetics by accelerating the transfer of holes to the photoelectrode surface. The work testifies the promise of combing metal-doping with constructing heterojunctions using ultrathin g-C3N4 to enhance water oxidation performance, and provides an excellent reference for designing and constructing efficient photoanodes for PEC water oxidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据