4.8 Article

From rational construction to theoretical study: Li3V2(PO4)3 nanoplates with exposed {100} facets for achieving highly stable lithium storage

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 442, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227231

关键词

Li3V2(PO4)(3) cathode; Cycling stability; Large scale production; Anisotropic ion diffusion; Interfacial properties

资金

  1. Foundation of National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Power Sources [6142808020117C01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The polyanionic cathodes with high safety and appropriate redox potential, attract tremendous attention for Li-ion batteries. However, their high-rate cycling stability and poor industrial feasibility still remain great challenges. Herein, Li3V2(PO4)(3) nanoplates with dominate {100} exposed facets embedded in a N-doped carbon matrix are successfully constructed. The in-situ dispersion-chelating approach benefits from reductive hydrogen peroxide and polyacrylamide, which acts as a strong ligand that coordinates the precursors to the polymer chains, resulting in a desirable construction of a highly porous structure (surface area: 69.667 m(2) g(-1)) with homogeneous carbon coating, and thus facilitating structural stability. Therefore, the designed Li3V2(PO4)(3)/C composite displays competitive capacities with outstanding cycle stabilities (95.8% retention after 500 cycles at 1C rate and 89.1% after 2000 cycles at 20C rate) under both two and three electron exchange conditions. Moreover, theoretical studies are applied to explore the origin of enhanced kinetics. The molecular dynamics simulations demonstrate an anisotropic Li+ diffusion with a fast [100]-oriented diffusion channel. The first-principles calculations reveal that the architecture induced by defect carbon can provide better interfacial stability and electronic conductive medium. This developed strategy combined with mechanism study provides an exciting perspective and avenue for establishing more-efficient electrode materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据