4.6 Article

Blends of Chalcone Benzoxazine and Bio-benzoxazines Coated Cotton Fabrics for Oil-Water Separation and Bio-silica Reinforced Nanocomposites for Low-k Applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF POLYMERS AND THE ENVIRONMENT
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 598-613

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10924-019-01629-2

关键词

Bio-phenols; Polybenzoxazine; Hydrophobic; oleophilic nature; Oil-water separation; Dielectric constant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work, chalcone benzoxazine (Chal-Bz) was co-polymerized with two bio-based benzoxazines namely cardanol (CrAb) and eugenol (EuAb) benzoxazine and coated over cotton fabric. The Chal-Bz/CrAb and Chal-Bz/EuAb blends coated cotton fabrics show water contact angle values of 163 degrees and 156 degrees respectively and their oil-water separation efficiency were observed found to be 97 and 96% respectively. In addition, the glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (GPTMS) functionalized bio-silica in varying weight percentages (1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 wt%) was also reinforced with two co-polymerized blended matrices to obtain respective composites. The developed composites were studied for their dielectric, thermal and morphological behaviours. The values of dielectric constant of 10 wt% bio-silica reinforced Chal-Bz/CrAb and Chal-Bz/EuAb composites were found to be 2.1 and 2.3, respectively. Similarly the values of contact angle of 10 wt% bio-silica reinforced chal-Bz/CrAb and Chal-Bz/EuAb composites were 137 degrees and 116 degrees, respectively. Data obtained from different studies suggest that these bio-silica reinforced benzoxazine composites can be used in the form of coatings, adhesives, sealants and encapsulants for high performance micro-electronics insulation applications under adverse environmental conditions. Graphic Thermal assisted polymerization of chalcone based benzoxazine (Chal-Bz) with bio based benzoxazines cardanol-aniline based benzoxazine (CrAb) and eugenol-aniline based benzoxazine (EuAb)) for low k and oil-water separation application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据