4.5 Article

Pyrene-stabilized acenes as intermolecular singlet fission candidates: importance of exciton wave-function convergence

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER
卷 32, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/ab699e

关键词

molecular crystals; singlet fission; electronic structure; GW plus BSE; excitons

资金

  1. Charles E Kaufman Foundation [KA2017-91789]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) Division of Materials Research [DMR-1844484]
  3. DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. Office of Science of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Singlet fission (SF) is a photophysical process considered as a possible scheme to bypass the Shockley-Queisser limit by generating two triplet-state excitons from one high-energy photon. Polyacene crystals, such as tetracene and pentacene, have shown outstanding SF performance both theoretically and experimentally. However, their instability prevents them from being utilized in SF-based photovoltaic devices. In search of practical SF chromophores, we use many-body perturbation theory within the GW approximation and Bethe-Salpeter equation to study the excitonic properties of a family of pyrene-stabilized acenes. We propose a criterion to define the convergence of exciton wave-functions with respect to the fine k-point grid used in the BerkeleyGW code. An open-source Python code is presented to perform exciton wavefunction convergence checks and streamline the double Bader analysis of exciton character. We find that the singlet excitons in pyrene-stabilized acenes have a higher degree of charge transfer character than in the corresponding acenes. The pyrene-fused tetracene and pentacene derivatives exhibit comparable excitation energies to their corresponding acenes, making them potential SF candidates. The pyrene-stabilized anthracene derivative is considered as a possible candidate for triplet-triplet annihilation because it yields a lower SF driving force than anthracene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据