4.6 Article

Ocean Circulation Connecting Fram Strait to Glaciers off Northeast Greenland: Mean Flows, Topographic Rossby Waves, and Their Forcing

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 50, 期 2, 页码 509-530

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JPO-D-19-0085.1

关键词

Ocean; Arctic; Channel flows; Coastal flows; Ekman pumping; transport; Rossby waves

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [OPP-1362109, OPP-1604076]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KA-3204/5-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

From 2014 through 2016 we instrumented the similar to 80-km-wide Norske Trough near 78 degrees N latitude that cuts across the 250-km-wide shelf from Fram Strait to the coast. Our measurements resolve a similar to 10-km-wide bottom-intensified jet that carries 0.27 +/- 0.06 Sv (1 Sv equivalent to 10(6) m(3) s(-1)) of warm Atlantic water from Fram Strait toward the glaciers off northeast Greenland. Mean shoreward flows along the steep canyon walls reach 0.1 m s(-1) about 50 m above the bottom in 400-m-deep water. The same bottom-intensified vertical structure emerges as the first dominant empirical orthogonal function that explains about 70%-80% of the variance at individual mooring locations. We interpret the current variability as remotely forced wave motions that arrive at our sensor array with periodicities longer than 6 days. Coherent motions with a period near 20 days emerge in our array as a dispersive topographic Rossby wave that propagates its energy along the sloping canyon toward the coast with a group speed of about 63 km day(-1). Amplitudes of wave currents reach 0.1 m s(-1) in the winter of 2015/16. The wave is likely generated by Ekman pumping over the shelfbreak where sea ice is always mobile. More than 40% of the along-slope ocean current variance near the bottom of the canyon correlates with vertical Ekman pumping velocities 180 km away. In contrast, the impact of local winds on the observed current fluctuations is negligible. Dynamics appear linear and Rossby wave motions merely modulate the mean flow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据