4.6 Article

Temperature-Dependent Na-Ion Conduction and Its Pathways in the Crystal Structure of the Layered Battery Material Na2Ni2TeO6

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 124, 期 8, 页码 4421-4429

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b11191

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Na-ion conduction and correlations between Na-ion conduction pathways and the crystal structure have been investigated as a function of temperature in the layered battery material Na2Ni2TeO6 by impedance spectroscopy and neutron diffraction, respectively. The impedance data reveal an ionic conductivity of sigma approximate to 2 X 10(-4) S/m at 323 K, which strongly enhances with increasing temperature and attains a high value of similar to 0.03 S/m at 423 K. The temperature-dependent conductivity data show an Arrhenius-type behavior with an average activation energy (E-a) of similar to 0.58(3) eV for T >= 383 K. By employing soft bond valence sum analysis of the neutron diffraction patterns, we experimentally demonstrate the site-specific Na-ion conductions through visualization of microscopic sodium-ion conduction pathways and verify the recent theoretical results of molecular dynamics simulation. Our results reveal two-dimensional Na-ion conduction pathways that are confined within the ab planes of Na layers. Crystal structural study indicates that the layered structure involving Na-ion layers is responsible for high ionic conductivity, and the local crystallographic environment of Na-ion sites is responsible for site-specific conductivity. Our study further reveals that, for up to 500 K, the ionic conduction is governed by the Na ions located at the Na1 and Na2 sites, whereas all the Na ions located at the three Na sites contribute to the conduction process above 500 K Our neutron diffraction study also establishes that the crystal structure of Na2Ni2TeO6 is stable for at least up to 725 K (the highest measured temperature), however, with an anisotropic thermal expansion (alpha(c)/alpha(a) similar to 3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据