4.6 Article

Defective Phosphorene as a Promising Anchoring Material for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 124, 期 5, 页码 2739-2746

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b06023

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51771144, 11704304]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2019TD-020, 2017JZ015, 2018JQ1028]
  3. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Surface Engineering and Remanufacturing [tyw12019-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lithium-sulfur battery, despite having considerable advantages, is still far from its practical applications, which is primarily caused by the dissolution of polysulfide clusters of lithium (LiPSs) into the electrolyte. Entrapping these LiPSs through integration of the anchoring material with the electrode is an effective approach to overcome this problem. In this study, density functional theory and ab initio molecular dynamics have been adopted to systematically examine the anchoring behaviors of two-dimensional phosphorene-based (monovacancy/oxygen-/sulfur-doped) materials, for all the intermediates of polysulfide. The defective sites provide strong adsorption for polysulfide clusters by generating firm chemical bonds together with van der Waals interactions. As a result, the intermediate discharge products could be thermodynamically stabilized on these defective substrates, against the local environment with virtually alike to initial configurations, which cannot be achieved with pristine phosphorene. Moreover, the emerging midgap states in the electronic structures of defective phosphorene and adsorptive systems improve the electrical conductivity of the defective-phosphorene-based electrode, alleviating the low rate capability related with pristine-phosphorene based batteries. It is illustrated that the anchoring ability of pristine phosphorene can be significantly improved by the defects, among which the monovacancy structure demonstrates superior performance for achieving long cycle life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据