4.5 Article

Revisiting the Liquid-Liquid Phase Behavior of n-Alkanes and Ethanol

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 124, 期 1, 页码 156-172

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b07214

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mixtures of alkanes and ethanol are important in many areas, for example, as fuel blends. This paper describes new experimental data obtained for the liquid-liquid equilibrium phase behavior of normal alkanes (n-alkanes; CnH2n+2; 9 <= n <= 24) with ethanol. The results were obtained by applying the cloud point method in a temperature range of T = 230-423 K at ambient pressure. All systems are partially miscible with an upper critical solution point. The two phase regions of the phase diagrams show no indication of any obvious optical irregularities, like birefringence, coloring, formation of schlieren, or remarkable turbidity, except critical opalescence. With increasing length of the molecular chain of the n-alkanes, the (liquid-liquid) critical point is shifted to higher temperatures and higher ethanol content. The data are analyzed numerically implying Ising criticality. The nonsymmetric shape of the phase body is considered in different approaches for describing the diameter by presuming (a) the validity of the rectilinear diameter rule, (b) a nonlinear diameter predicted in the theory of complete scaling, and (c) combining both concepts. The numerical analysis yields the critical temperature, the critical composition, the width, and the diameter of the phase diagrams. The results are compared with literature data sets from similar mixtures; these data are also evaluated in terms of the models applied here. Phase diagrams of 13 different sets of mixtures are measured and analyzed to extract general aspects of the behavior of the normal alkane-ethanol mixtures. A simple Flory-Huggins-like approach allows a semiquantitative description of the experimental results of the critical temperatures. Therefore, it confirms the picture of molecular ordering within the solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据