4.4 Article

Accurate Measurements of the Gross Calorific Value of Methane by the Renewed GERG Calorimeter

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5110054

关键词

flame calorimetry; gross calorific value; isoperibolic calorimeter; methane; thermodynamic properties

资金

  1. Ruhr University Bochum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to the commercial transfer of billions of cubic meters of natural gases, the knowledge of the gross calorific value (GCV) of the main natural gas components and, in particular, of methane, is of outstanding interest. On the basis of previous work carried out by a Groupe Europeen de Recherches Gazieres (GERG)-Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt collaboration, the so-called GERG calorimeter was further developed on the hardware as well as on the software side. With the renewed GERG calorimeter, the GCV of CH4 could be determined with unprecedented precision and accuracy. Important elements for improving the measuring methodology of flame calorimetry included the in situ calibration of the mass of the burned gas, the determination of the actual exhaust gas temperatures, and the detection of the water input by countercurrent water absorption from ambient air. For the first time, it was possible to determine the GCV not only via direct online weighing of the mass of burned gas but also via the stoichiometric water balance with a consistency of about 3.5 ppm. Based on 27 weighings of the mass of burned gas, the real-gas GCV of methane is determined as H-s(CH4) = 890202.1 J mol(-1) with a confidence interval of +/- 52.6 J mol(-1) (t(95%) = 2.056). This value is by Delta H-s/H-s = (-0.0436 +/- 0.0059)% below the real-gas GCV of H-s(CH4)= (890 590 +/- 380) J mol(-1) (k = 2) converted according to ISO 6976:2016. The difference can be explained by systematic influences as well as by failures in the stoichiometric water balance in all other measurements. Published by AIP Publishing on behalf of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据