4.5 Article

Development and evaluation of a novel seawater-based viscoelastic fracturing fluid system

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106408

关键词

Viscoelastic fracturing fluid; Seawater; Performance evaluation; Microstructure

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Planning Project [2017ZX05023003-003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51834010, 51874337]
  3. Chang Jiang Scholars Program [T2014152]
  4. Climb Taishan Scholar Program in Shandong Province [tspd20161004]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [18CX06012A]
  6. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on the situation of the freshwater shortage during the large scale hydraulic fracturing on offshore-platform, a novel seawater-based viscoelastic fracturing fluid system was developed. The system was composed with a commercial anionic - nonionic viscoelastic surfactant named Fatty Methyl Ester Sulfonates (FMES) with the concentration of 60 mmol/L, the South China Sea simulated seawater with the TDS of 32500 mg/L and Na+ with the concentration of 1320 mmol/L. On the basis of this fracturing fluid system, a series of performances have been evaluated through extensive experiments. Analysis of laboratory tests indicated that the new fluid has good viscosity stability, low fluid loss and high proppant suspending ability under 75 degrees C. This fluid always appeared as a pseudoplastic fluid at various shearing speeds. After high speed shearing, the viscosity recovered quickly which means the fluid has remarkable self-repairability. This fluid breaks rapidly once oil injected. The observed permeability return rate achieved through core flooding experiment was over 70%, which indicated low formation damage after fracturing. Furthermore, the vermicular micelle and microstructure of fluid system has been discovered through Cryogenic Transmission Electron Microscope (cryo-TEM), which well explained the mechanism of excellent performances of fluid system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据