4.6 Article

Gestational Age, Perinatal Characteristics, and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Birth Cohort Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 220, 期 -, 页码 175-+

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.01.022

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging [R01AG034676]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [MH093522]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To determine how gestational age relates to research-identified autism spectrum disorder (ASD-R) in the context of perinatal risk factors. Study design This is a population-based cohort study using the 1994-2000 Olmsted County Birth Cohort. Children included were born and remained in Olmsted County after age 3 years. ASD-R status was determined from signs and symptoms abstracted from medical and educational records. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to identify associations between perinatal characteristics and ASD-R. Results The incidence of preterm birth (<37 weeks' gestation) was 8.6% among 7876 children. The cumulative incidence of ASD-R was 3.8% (95% CI 3.3-4.2) at 21 years of age. Compared with children born at full term, the risk of ASD-R appeared to be increased for children born preterm with unadjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of 2.62 (95% CI 0.65-10.57), 1.68 (95% CI 0.54-5.29), and 1.60 (95% CI 1.06-2.40) for children born extremely preterm, very preterm, and moderate-to-late preterm, respectively. In a multivariable model adjusted for perinatal characteristics, the associations were attenuated with adjusted HRs of 1.75 (95% CI 0.41-7.40), 1.24 (95% CI 0.38-4.01), and 1.42 (95% CI 0.93-2.15), for children born extremely preterm, very preterm, and moderate-to-late preterm, respectively. Among children with maternal history available (N = 6851), maternal psychiatric disorder was associated with ASD-R (adjusted HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.24-2.42). Conclusions The increased risk of ASD-R among children born preterm relative to children born full term was attenuated by infant and maternal characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据