4.4 Review

Blood brain barrier: A tissue engineered microfluidic chip

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
卷 331, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108525

关键词

BBB-on-a-Chip; Blood-brain barrier; Microfluidics; Shear stress; Permeability

资金

  1. Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University MOE Start-Up Grant
  2. NTU Austrian Institute of Technology & Medical University of Vienna internal grant, Singapore [NAM/15005]
  3. University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India
  4. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Data Science And Artificial Intelligence Research Centre (DSAIR) grant [ADH-11/2017-DSAIR]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the increasing concern of neurological diseases, the improvised therapy for neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease is crucial. Yet, the efficacious delivery of drug across blood-brain barrier (BBB) remains a formidable challenge. BBB acts as a gate keeper to prevent the ingress of harmful foreign agents into the brain. It has built a great interest in designing BBB models to boost the field of neurotherapeutics. Recently, microfluidic systems are gaining ground in cell culture and bio-system analysis. It creates a new era of micro engineered laboratory onto a chip by combining the benefits of both in vitro and in vivo models. The high-fidelity microfluidic BBB-on-a-Chip possess the engineered physiological microenvironment for real time monitoring of barrier properties with human derived stem cells. These emerging models have intrinsic merits of regulating micro-scale fluid delivery and versatile fabrication. Moreover, the progress of 3D printing technology and versatility of stem cells assist in fabricating these robust and reproducible models. This review revolves around the various approaches of modelling microfluidic BBBs and emphasises on the limitations of existing models and technology. It contributes to the interdisciplinary engineering aspects of BBB research and its magnificent impact on drug development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据