4.7 Review

Liquid-phase adsorption: Common problems and how we could do better

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 301, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.112378

关键词

Adsorption; Error; Langmuir; Catalysis; Equilibrium constant; Adsorption kinetics

资金

  1. IChemE Andrew Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adsorption plays a vital role in many applications from adsorbents for concentrating valuable compounds or removing pollutants to catalysts. In gas and liquid phases, the adsorption phenomena may look similar and the results are often transferred. But solvents play a role and may change the adsorption behaviour even for strong adsorbates liquid phase adsorption is different! The review covers kinetics and thermodynamics of adsorption processes and focuses on several areas that receive only minor attention despite being crucial for obtaining reliable results. Such underappreciated areas include the analysis of how to maximise experimental accuracy of adsorption studies and analyse the model parameters and their confidence intervals; the effect of the mathematical representation and model linearization on the results; the possibility of processes other than adsorption during the experiments. The experiments based on disappearance of the adsorbate from the equilibrium solution shall be performed to ensure at least 10% decrease in concentration for reasonable accuracy. Regression analysis and analysis of the confidence intervals of the parameters merit particular attention as well as an independent validation of the model assumptions. Even an excellent data fit may provide results differing by several times from the correct values. Adding to the dispute on dimensions in the adsorption constants in van't Hoof equation, the review adds arguments in favour of using constants in L/mol units. The review concludes with the proposed workflow in the analysis of liquid-phase adsorption data from the data acquisition to data analysis and modelling and offers a Matlab app for Langmuir adsorption data analysis. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据