4.7 Review

TADs and Their Borders: Free Movement or Building a Wall?

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 432, 期 3, 页码 643-652

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.11.025

关键词

TADs; topologically associating domains; CTCF; loop extrusion; Hi-C

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de Recherche [ANR-14-ACHN-0009-01, ANR-16-TERC-0027-01, ANR-17-CE12-0001-02]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-14-ACHN-0009, ANR-17-CE12-0001, ANR-16-TERC-0027] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tridimensional (3D) organization of mammalian genomes combines structures from different length scales. Within this organization, Topologically Associating Domains (TADs) are visible in Hi-C heat maps at the sub-megabase scale. The integrity of TADs is important for correct gene expression, but in a context-dependent and variable manner. The correct structure and function of TADs require the binding of the CTCF protein at both borders, which appears to block an active and dynamic mechanism of Cohesin-mediated loop extrusion. As a result, mammalian TADs appear as so-called loop domains in Hi-C data, which are the focus of this review. Here, we present a reanalysis of TADs from three golden-standard mammalian Hi-C data sets. Despite the prominent presence of TADs in Hi-C heat maps from all studies, we find consistently that regions within these domains are only moderately insulated from their surroundings. Moreover, single-cell Hi-C and superresolution microscopy have revealed that the structure of TADs and the position of their borders can vary from cell to cell. The function of TADs as units of gene regulation may thus require additional aspects, potentially incorporating the mechanism of loop extrusion as well. Recent developments in single-cell and multi-contact genomics and superresolution microscopy assays will be instrumental to link TAD formation and structure to their function in transcriptional regulation. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据