4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

A Meshless Practical Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy Modification and Long-term Outcomes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY
卷 27, 期 7, 页码 1573-1580

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.02.011

关键词

Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy modification; Pelvic organ prolapse; Meshless technique sacrohysteropexy; Sacrohysteropexy without using mesh

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objective: To describe a new modification of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy without using a mesh and report the 3-year outcomes. Design: A prospective cohort study. Setting: Minimally Invasive Gynecology Unit, Bursa Uludag University Hospital, Turkey. Patients: Women who were diagnosed with >= stage 2 uterine prolapse. Interventions: A laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy modification using a polyester fiber suture instead of a standard polypropylene mesh. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was the anatomic success of the repair, with success defined as objective parameters using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system. The secondary outcomes were subjective outcomes, which were assessed using the quality-of-life scales. Forty-seven women who underwent the procedure were followed up for a minimum of 3 years. Forty-four of the 47 patients had stage 0 or 1 prolapse at the end of the second year, according to the primary outcomes. The anatomic success rate was 93.6%. In the secondary outcomes, 2 patients were not satisfied with their pelvic floor after the second year. The subjective cure rate was 95.7%. There was a statistically significant improvement in both pelvic organ prolapse quantification and quality-of-life scores in the third postoperative year. The mean operating time was 84.6 minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 21.3 mL. There were no bladder or bowel complications in the perioperative or postoperative period. Conclusion: Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy can be performed safely with this meshless modification in uterine prolapse as an alternative. (c) 2020 AAGL. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据