4.7 Article

Self-crosslinked blend alkaline anion exchange membranes with bi-continuous phase separated morphology to enhance ion conductivity

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 597, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117769

关键词

Alkaline exchange membrane fuel cell; Blending; Self-crosslinking; Ion conductivity; Phase-separated morphology

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21875161]
  2. Open Research Fund Program of State Key Laboratory of Engines [K2018-13]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Separation Membranes and Membrane Processes [M1-201704]
  4. Planning & Budgeting Committee/ISRAEL Council for Higher Education (CHE)
  5. Fuel Choice Initiative (Prime Minister Office of ISRAEL)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Combining two facile methods, spinodal blending and self-crosslinking by chloromethyl groups are jointly utilized in fabricating alkaline anion exchange membranes (AEMs). Highly and moderately chloromethylated poly (ether ether ketone)s and sub-equimolar (to chlommethyl) amounts of 1-methylimidazole are mixed and reacted to form blend AEMs. Nanoscale bi-continuous phase separated morphologies are obtained due to spinodal decomposition. Subsequent heat treatment triggers self-crosslinking of the AEMs arising from residual chloromethyl groups in membranes. Compared with unblended and uncrosslinked AEMs having similar ion exchange capacity (IEC), the ion conductivity of the present AEMs is increased by 45.4% in water and 113% in 95% RH at 60 degrees C. Dimensional and alkaline stabilities of AEMs are also enhanced by the self-crosslinking, i.e., the swelling ratio decreases by 50.3% at 60 degrees C and the residual conductivity increases by 26.3% after alkaline treatment in 1 M NaOH at 60 degrees C. Interestingly, individual spinodal blending or self-crosslinking are found ineffective in overcoming the trade-off between AEM conductivity and stability, while a combination of both methods leads to a simultaneous improvement in conductivity and membrane stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据