4.7 Article

Synthesis of Bi2S3/carbon nanocomposites as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 50, 期 -, 页码 92-102

出版社

JOURNAL MATER SCI TECHNOL
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.01.045

关键词

Metal sulfides; Anode material; Lithium-ion battery; Electrochemical properties; Density functional theory

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) inthe UK [EP/M027066/1, EP/R021554/1]
  2. EPSRC of the UK [EP/P020232/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/P020194/1]
  4. Eureka HPC cluster at the University of Surrey
  5. EPSRC [EP/P020232/1, EP/R021554/1, EP/P020194/1, EP/R021554/2, EP/M027066/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal sulfides such as Bismuth sulfide (Bi2S3) hold immense potential to be promoted as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), owing to their high theoretical gravimetric and volumetric capacities. However, the poor electrical conductivity and volume expansion during cycling hinder the practical applications of Bi2S3. In this work, we used pyrrole and glucose as carbon source to design the surface carbon coating on the surface of Bi2S3 particles, to improve the structural stability of Bi2S3. Two composite materials were synthesized - Bi2S3 coated with nitrogen doped carbon (Bi2S3@NC), and Bi2S3 coated with carbon (Bi2S3@C). When used as anode active materials, both Bi2S3@NC and Bi2S3@C showed improved performance compared to Bi2S3, which confirms surface carbon coating as an effective and scalable way for the modification of Bi2S3 material. The electrode based on Bi2S3@NC materials demonstrated higher performance than that of Bi2S3@C, with an initial discharge capacity of 1126.5 mA h/g, good cycling stability (500 mA h/g after 200 cycles at 200 mA/g) and excellent rate capability. Finally, Li storage and migration mechanisms in Bi2S3 are revealed using first principle density functional theory calculations. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The editorial office of Journal of Materials Science & Technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据