4.6 Review

Recent advances in multifunctional hydroxyapatite coating by electrochemical deposition

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 55, 期 15, 页码 6352-6374

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-020-04467-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [18JCQNJC03400]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian [2018J01504, 2018J01505]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11702187]
  4. Opening Project of Green Dyeing and Finishing Engineering Research Center of Fujian University [2017001A, 2017001B, 2017002B]
  5. Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Tianjin [TD13-5043]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bio-ceramic hydroxyapatite (HA) coating has been commonly used to repair the bones or as the functionalized surface of bone substitutes due to its excellent biocompatibility, superior osteo-inductivity, and great corrosion resistance. Among many other methods for synthesizing HA coating, coating via the electrochemical deposition has a high degree of crystallinity and purity, which fits the nonlinear, complex, and rugged substrates. Furthermore, HA coating can be adjusted in terms of coating morphology, thickness, and chemical component via changing the parameters, such as electrolyte ion concentration, electrolyte composition, deposition current density, and deposition time, etc. Nevertheless, the properties of electrodeposited HA coating highly pertain to the bubbles generated by water electrolysis on the substrate surface as well as the concentration polarization of electrolyte ions near the cathode during the electrodeposition process. In this study, the critical factors and mechanisms of HA coating using the electrochemical deposition method are comprehensively evaluated, thereby examining the effects of parameter optimization (i.e., current mode, ultrasonic treatment, and postprocessing). Finally, the influences of ion substitution and HA composite coating on the surface structure and properties of the HA-based coatings are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据