4.7 Article

The effect of street canyon design on traffic noise exposure along roads

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 96-110

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.11.033

关键词

Road traffic noise; Street design; Building envelope design; Urban geometry; Urban sound propagation; Noise reduction

资金

  1. People Programme Marie Curie Actions of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme FP7/under REA, SONORUS Urban Sound Planner [290110]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abating road traffic noise pollution is one of the main urban environmental challenges nowadays. However, architects and urbanists take decisions on urban regulations that define the shape of streets and buildings without taking this aspect into account. Furthermore, there is little information about the influence of urban geometry on traffic noise exposure in streets. In this study, the effect of street canyon design on sound pressure level distribution is numerically studied in high detail with the full-wave finite-difference time-domain method (FDTD). The CNOSSOS equivalent source power spectra were used to approach road traffic noise sources along two traffic lanes. Receivers both along the facades and the sidewalks have been considered in 42 cases. Numerical results demonstrate that building shape, street geometry and the presence of street furniture can have a strong impact on people's noise exposure. Building shape can be responsible for variations of up to 7.0 dB(A) at pedestrians. Building-facade design can reduce the average exposure at windows with 12.9 dB(A). It was further predicted that street geometry can enhance the positive effect of low barriers to 11.3 dB(A) along sidewalks. It was therefore concluded that carefully designing building facades and street geometry could improve the sound climate for people living and walking along busy urban streets and should be considered in future urban street design. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据