4.5 Article

Effect of calcium treatment on magnetic properties of non-oriented electrical steels

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165803

关键词

Calcium treatment; Magnetic properties; Precipitate; Inclusion; Non-oriented electrical steel

资金

  1. National Science Foundation China [U1860206, 51725402]
  2. Beijing International Center of Advanced and Intelligent Manufacturing of High Quality Steel Materials (ICSM)
  3. Beijing Key Laboratory of Green Recycling and Extraction of Metals (GREM)
  4. High Quality Steel Consortium (HQSC) at the School of Metallurgical and Ecological Engineering at University of Science and Technology Beijing (USTB), China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of calcium treatment on magnetic properties of non-oriented electrical steels was studied. Inclusions, precipitates, grain size and textures of final annealed sheets were analyzed and their effects on magnetic properties of the steel were discussed. Inclusions varied from Al2O3-MnS to Al2O3-CaS-(CaO) due to the reaction of calcium and sulfur after calcium treatment. The number density of (Mn, Cu)S precipitates decreased with the increasing Ca/S in the steel, which also favored to the grain growth of final products. Both of the texture factors of {100}/{111} and ({100}+{110})/{111} were increased from 0.22 and 0.34 to 0.37 and 0.50, respectively, due to the increase of the volume fraction of {100} from 8.34% to 15.80% with the increasing Ca/S from 0 to 1. The core loss decreased by 0.25 W/kg with Ca/S increasing from 0 to 1 in the steel, due to less (Mn, Cu) S precipitates and larger grain size. However, the increase in the number density of Al2O3-CaS-(CaO) inclusions caused by calcium treatment increased the volume fraction of {111} fiber textures, having a detrimental effect on the magnetic induction of the steel. Therefore, in order to improve the steel magnetic properties, inclusions of Al2O3-CaS-(CaO) formed after calcium treatment should be removed as much as possible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据