4.6 Article

Eu3+ doped lutetium molybdenum oxides: Synthesis, optical properties, thermal behavior, and LED packaging

期刊

JOURNAL OF LUMINESCENCE
卷 217, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2019.116759

关键词

Phosphor; Photoluminescence; Optical properties; Thermal behavior

类别

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2017J01719, 2018J01429]
  2. Fujian Key Laboratory of Functional Materials and Applications open projects [fma2017106, fma2018001]
  3. Program for Innovative Research Team in Science and Technology in Fujian Province University (IRTSTFJ)
  4. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2018R1A2B6005179]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [22A20131112367] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some lutetium molybdenum oxides were synthesized through a solid-state reaction method. By adjusting the molar ratios of raw materials of Lu2O3 (Eu2O3) to MoO3, Eu3+ doped lutetium molybdenum oxides Lu2MoO6, Lu2Mo2O9, Lu-2(MoO4)(3), and Lu6MoO12 were obtained. The materials were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns, scanning electron microscope (SEM) images, energy-dispersive spectra (EDS), diffuse reflection (DR) spectra, photoluminescence (PL) excitation and emission spectra, luminescence decay curves, and temperature dependent integrated emission spectra. Enhanced excitation and emission spectra were recorded at high temperatures. Possible energy transfer processes were proposed to explain the excitation and emission spectra. By combining some phosphors with near ultraviolet (NUV) chips, the obtained light emitting diodes (LEDs) gave red light under forward bias current. The results suggest that the obtained Eu3+ doped lutetium molybdenum oxides have potential applications in phosphor converted based NUV LEDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据