4.7 Article

Research Techniques Made Simple: Cell Biology Methods for the Analysis of Pigmentation

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 140, 期 2, 页码 257-+

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.12.002

关键词

-

资金

  1. United States National Institutes of Health's National Eye Institute [5R01 EY015625]
  2. National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases [5R01 AR071382, 5R01 AR048155]
  3. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale [Equipe FRM : EQU201903007827]
  4. L'Oreal
  5. Institut Curie
  6. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM)
  7. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France
  8. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR `Myoactions') [ANR-17-CE11-0029-03]
  9. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [666003]
  10. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-17-CE11-0029] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pigmentation of the skin and hair represents the result of melanin biosynthesis within melanosomes of epidermal melanocytes, followed by the transfer of mature melanin granules to adjacent keratinocytes within the basal layer of the epidermis. Natural variation in these processes produces the diversity of skin and hair color among human populations, and defects in these processes lead to diseases such as oculocutaneous albinism. While genetic regulators of pigmentation have been well studied in human and animal models, we are still learning much about the cell biological features that regulate melanogenesis, melanosome maturation, and melanosome motility in melanocytes, and have barely scratched the surface in our understanding of melanin transfer from melanocytes to keratinocytes. Herein, we describe cultured cell model systems and common assays that have been used by investigators to dissect these features and that will hopefully lead to additional advances in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据