4.7 Article

Fate of antibiotic resistance genes in reclaimed water reuse system with integrated membrane process

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 382, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121025

关键词

Antibiotic resistance genes; Integrated membrane process; Reclaimed water reuse system; Removal efficiency; Bacterial community

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41877131]
  2. Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province [tsqn201812116]
  3. One Hundred Talents Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [Y629041021]
  4. Two-Hundred Talents Plan of Yantai [Y739011021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fate of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in reclaimed water reuse system with integrated membrane process (IMR) was firstly investigated. Results indicated that ARGs, class 1 integrons (intI1) and 16S rRNA gene could be reduced efficiently in the IMR system. The absolute abundance of all detected ARGs in the reuse water after reverse osmosis (RO) filtration of the IMR system was 4.03 x 10(4) copies/mL, which was about 2-3 orders of magnitude lower than that in the raw influent of the wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Maximum removal efficiency of the detected genes was up to 3.8 log removal values. Daily flux of the summation of all selected ARGs in the IMR system decreased sharply to (1.02 +/- 1.37) x 10(14) copies/day, which was 1-3 orders of magnitude lower than that in the activated sludge system (CAS) system. The strong clustering based on ordination analysis separated the reuse water from other water samples in the WWTPs. Network analysis revealed the existence of potential multi-antibiotic resistant bacteria. The potential multi-antibiotic resistant bacteria, including Clostridium and Defluviicoccus, could be removed effectively by microfiltration and RO filtration. These findings suggested that the IMR system was efficient to remove ARGs and potential multi-antibiotic resistant bacteria in the wastewater reclamation system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据