4.7 Article

Nitrogen doped carbon quantum dots and GO modified WO3 nanosheets combination as an effective visible photo catalyst

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 382, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121087

关键词

Nitrogen doped carbon quantum dots; Photo catalysis; Ternary composites; Graphene oxide; Tungsten oxide; Methyl orange

资金

  1. International Islamic University Islamabad (IIUI), Pakistan, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (NRPU research grant) [3660]
  2. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Municipal International Cooperation Foundation [18230742900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrogen doped carbon quantum dots (NCQDs) based highly efficient ternary photocatalyst are fabricated by modifying surface of GO incorporated WO3 nano-sheets. XRD confirmed the formation of monoclinicWO(3) nanosheets. All the characteristic peaks of WO3, GO and NCQDs are obvious in XRD patterns of WO3/GO/NCQDs ternary photocatalysts confirming successful fabrication of the photocatalysts. SEM images showed that WO3 host matrix is distorted after incorporation of GO and NCQDs owing to lower interfacial tension. The surface of WO3 nano-sheets is modified with morphological defects making more active sites available. UV-vis spectra exhibited extended visible light absorption and remarkable reduction of WO3 band gap energy. The photoluminescence spectra confirmed the efficient charge separation in NCQDs modified ternary photocatalyst. The synthesized composites were applied for the photocatalytic degradation of harmful organic dye i.e. methyl orange (MO). The ternary composites represented the excellent photocatalytic activity as compared to binary and pure WO3 photocatalysts. This enhanced photocatalytic activity is attributed to the availability of active sites, extended light absorption in visible region and enhanced charge separation efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据