4.7 Article

New insight into fates of sulfonamide and tetracycline resistance genes and resistant bacteria during anaerobic digestion of manure at thermophilic and mesophilic temperatures

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 384, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121433

关键词

Manure anaerobic digestion; Antibiotic resistance genes; Antibiotic resistant bacteria; Temperatures; Mechanisms of ARGs reduction

资金

  1. Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [41773082, 41573065, 21337001]
  2. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment of China [2017ZX07202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the variations in antibiotic (sulfonamide and tetracycline) resistance genes (ARGs) and resistant bacteria (ARB) during manure anaerobic digestion (AD) at 35 degrees C and 55 degrees C, and discussed the mechanisms of variations in ARGs. The AD lasted for 60 days, five ARGs and intl1 each decreased in abundance after AD at the thermophilic temperature, while only half decreased at the mesophilic temperature. On days 10, 30, and 60, sulfonamide and tetracycline ARB were screened on selective media. During thermophilic AD, ARB numbers reduced by 4-log CFUs per gram dry manure, but only by approximately 1-log CFU at the mesophilic temperature. However, ARB composition analysis showed that at either temperature, no significant reduction in identified ARB species was observed. Furthermore, 72 ARB clones were randomly selected to detect the ARGs they harbored, and the results showed that each ARG was harbored by various hosts, and no definitive link existed between ARGs and bacterial species. In addition, by comparison with the identified host by culture method, the host prediction results based on the correlation analysis between ARGs and the bacterial community was proven to be unreliable. Overall, these findings indicated that relationships between ARB and ARGs were intricate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据