4.7 Article

Thermal degradation and pollutant emission from waste printed circuit boards mounted with electronic components

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 382, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121038

关键词

Electronic waste; Disassembly; Thermal degradation; Pollution emission

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41877468, 51778360]
  2. Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Environmental Catalysis and Pollution Control [GKLECPC-07]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [18ZR1418200]
  4. Shanghai Pujiang Program [18PJDO22]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Waste printed circuit boards mounted with electronic components (WPCB-ECs) are generated from electronic waste dismantling and recycling process. Air-borne pollutants, including particulate matter (PM) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), can be released during thermal treatment of WPCB-CEs. In this study, organic substances from WPCB-ECs were pyrolyzed by both thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) and in a quartz tube furnace. We discovered that board resin and solder coating were degraded in a one-stage process, whereas capacitor scarfskin and wire jacket had two degradation stages. Debromination of brominated flame retardants occurred, and HBr and phenol were the main products during TGA processing of board resin. Dehydrochlorination occurred, and HCl, benzene and toluene were detected during the pyrolysis of capacitor scarfskin. Benzene formation was found only in the first degradation stage (272-372 degrees C), while toluene was formed both in the two degradation stages. PM with bimodal mass size distributions at diameters of 0.45-0.5 and 4-5 mu m were emitted during heating WPCB-ECs. The PM number concentrations were highest in the size ranges of 0.3-0.35 mu m and 1.6-2 mu m. The research produced new data on pollutant emissions during thermal treatment of WPCB-ECs, and information on strategies to prevent toxic exposures that compromise the health of recyclers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据