4.7 Article

In situ deposited hierarchical CuO/NiO nanowall arrays film sensor with enhanced gas sensing performance to H2S

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 385, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121570

关键词

CuO/NiO nanowall arrays; In situ deposition; Hierarchical structure; H2S sensor

资金

  1. Key Program for International Science & Technology Cooperation Projects of China [2016YFE0115100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21771060, 51802167, 21776144, 21978140]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [QC2018015]
  4. Heilongjiang Educational Department [135309442, 135309443]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hierarchical and heterogeneous CuO/NiO nanowall arrays were in situ grown on ceramic tubes via a facile template-free hydrothermal route, and then were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and nitrogen adsorption-desorption techniques. The resultant composites exhibit network-like CuO/NiO array structures constructed by interconnected porous nanosheets, in which the decoration of CuO nanoparticles in NiO nanowall arrays was confirmed by XRD, XPS and TEM analyses. The 2.84 at % CuO decorated NiO sensor exhibits excellent sensing properties at 133 degrees C. The response to 5 ppm H2S attains 36.9, which increases as high as 5.6 times compared to the NiO one. The detection limit to H2S is further decreased from 1 ppb for the pure NiO sensor to 0.5 ppb. The CuO/NiO sensor shows a wide linear range from 50 to 1000 ppb, good repeatability, selectivity and long-term stability, which is expected to be a candidate for ppb-level H2S detection in real and complex environment of industrial production. Furthermore, the dominant H2S sensing mechanism is discussed from the view of the homo- and hierarchical architecture of the CuO/NiO arrays as well as the chemical and electronic sensitization effects of CuO decoration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据