4.7 Article

Low level of polystyrene microplastics decreases early developmental toxicity of phenanthrene on marine medaka (Oryzias melastigma)

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 385, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121586

关键词

Oryzias melastigma; Polystyrene microplastics; Phenanthrene; Combined effect; Early development

资金

  1. Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research, CAFS & Key Laboratory of Sustainable Development of Marine Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, P. R. China [2019HYXKQ01]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [201964025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microplastics (MPs) have become global environmental concern. However, the effects of environmental concentrations of MPs, singly or in combination with organic pollutants, on the early development of marine fish remain unclear. In this study, fertilized eggs of marine medaka (Oryzias melastigma) were exposed to polystyrene MPs (0, 2, 20, 200 mu g/L) and/or phenanthrene (Phe, 50 mu g/L) for 28 days. The results revealed that MPs were accumulated on the chorion and ingested by larvae from 2 days post-hatching. High levels of MPs (20 and 200 mu g/L) decreased the hatchability, delayed the hatching time, and suppressed the growth, whereas Phe inhibited hatching and caused malformations in larvae. The presence of MPs at 20 and 200 mu g/L did not alter the toxicity of Phe. By contrast, combined exposure to 2 mu g/L MPs and Phe increased the hatchability by 25.8%, decreased malformation and mortality rates, and restored Phe-induced abnormal expressions of cardiac development-related genes. The reduced early developmental toxicity could be attributed to the decreased bioavailability and bioaccumulation of Phe by the low level of MPs. These findings contradicted the view that MPs would aggravate the toxicity of organic pollutants, and future studies are warranted to elucidate the ecological risks of marine MPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据