4.7 Article

Estrogens in municipal wastewater and receiving waters in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China: Occurrence and risk assessment of mixtures

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 389, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121891

关键词

Estrogens; River waters; Wastewater; Environmental risks; Emission sources

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1706217, 41671462, 41977359]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1600301]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017XTCX02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potentially high release of estrogens to surface waters due to high population density and local livestock production in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region may pose adverse effects on reproductive systems of aquatic organisms. This study found that total measured concentrations of estrone (E1), 17 beta-estradiol (E2), estriol (E3), 17 alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2) and diethylstilbestrol (DES) were 468 +/- 27 ng/L in treated wastewater and 219 +/- 23 ng/L in river waters in this region. E2, E3 and EE2 were the predominant estrogens in river waters. The restriction of DES for human use should have been enforced, however concentrations of DES were relatively high compared to other studies. Haihe and Yongdingxin Rivers delivered approximately 1.8 tonnes of estrogens to the Bohai Bay annually. Concentrations of individual estrogens were significantly higher in river waters in the dry season, however, mass loadings were significantly higher in the wet season. The average E2-equivalent concentrations reached 1.2 +/- 0.2 and 0.64 +/- 0.08 mu g-E2/L following long-term and short-term exposure estimates, respectively, in river waters with an EE2 contribution of over 90 %. This could give rise to high risks to fish. Estrogens in river waters largely derived from human excretion. Field studies on estrogenic effects on fish reproductive systems are required locally considering high estrogen contamination levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据