4.6 Article

Risk of second primary cancer in patients treated with radiotherapy for rectal cancer

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 104, 期 3, 页码 278-287

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10327

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Swedish Cancer Society
  3. Stockholm Cancer Society
  4. Stockholm County Council
  5. Karolinska Institute
  6. Strategic Research Programme in Epidemiology at Karolinska Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Many patients with rectal cancer receive radiotherapy (RT) to reduce the risk of local recurrence. Radiation may give rise to adverse effects, including second primary cancers. In view of the divergent results of previous studies, the present study evaluated the risk of second primary cancer following RT in all randomized RT rectal cancer trials conducted in Sweden and in the Swedish ColoRectal Cancer Registry (SCRCR). Methods: Patients included in five randomized trials and the SCRCR were linked to the Swedish Cancer Registry. Cox regression models estimated the hazard ratio (HR) of second primary cancer among patients who received RT compared with those who did not. Results: A total of 13 457 patients were included in this study; 7024 (52.2 per cent) received RT and 6433 (47.8 per cent) had surgery alone. Overall, no increased risk of second primary cancer was observed with RT (HR 1.03; 95 per cent c. i. 0.92 to 1.15), independently of follow-up time and location within or outside of the irradiated volume. In the randomized trials, with longer follow-up (maximum 31 years), a slight increase was observed outside of (HR 1.33, 1.01 to 1.74) but not within (HR 1.11, 0.73 to 1.67) the irradiated volume. Irradiated men had a lower risk of prostate cancer than those treated with surgery alone (HR 068, 0.51 to 091). Conclusion: Overall, there was no increased risk of second primary cancer following RT for rectal cancer within or outside of the irradiated volume up to 20 years of follow-up. Men with rectal cancer who received RT had a reduced risk of prostate cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据