4.7 Article

Evaluation of single and combined toxicity of bisphenol A and its analogues using a highly-sensitive micro-biosensor

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 381, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120908

关键词

Bisphenol analogues; CIK cells; Combined toxicity; Screen printed electrode; Micro-biosensor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51809044]
  2. Environmental Protection Project of Ecology and Environment Department of Jilin Province [2018-10]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2412018QD020]
  4. Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Projects [20190103136JH]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M630314]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bisphenol analogues have been developed as alternatives to bisphenol A (BPA), a common chemical with potential adverse effects on human health. It is imperative to perform a fast and sensitive evaluation for the toxicity of these bisphenol analogues. This study introduces a label-free electrochemical biosensor based on a screenprinted electrode modified with the carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotube/rhodamine B/gold nanoparticle. Ctenopharyngodon idella kidney (CIK) cells were used as the biological recognition agent to detect changes in electrochemical signals and indicate the cell viability. Only 20 mu L of sample was required for detection, which was much lower than that of other conventional electrochemical methods (>= 1 mL). This biosensor was examined for the cytotoxici of BPA, bi henol AF (BPAF bis henol B BP, on-concentra on (IC50) rattles a r 48h Of exposure indicated that the rank order of cytotoxicities was BPAF > BPB > BPA > BPF > BPS. The morphological changes in CIK cells after treatment with various bisphenols were investigated, and the combined toxicities of the- binary- hisphenai mixtures were determined. Potentisity -synergistic and additive effects were observed. These findings provide new insights into the cytotoxicity of bisphenol analogues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据