4.1 Review

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Glaucoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 312-321

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001463

关键词

optical coherence tomography angiography; glaucoma; vessel density; microvascular dropout

资金

  1. NIH [EY029058]
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness (New York, NY)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is a relatively new, noninvasive, dye-free imaging modality that provides a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the vasculature in the retina and optic nerve head. OCTA also enables visualization of the choriocapillaris, but only in areas of parapapillary atrophy. With OCTA, the movement of red blood cells is used as a contrast to delineate blood vessels from static tissues. The features seen with OCTA in eyes with glaucoma are reduction in the superficial vessel density in the peripapillary and macular areas, and complete loss of choriocapillaris in localized regions of parapapillary atrophy (called deep-layer microvascular dropout). These OCTA changes correlate well topographically with the functional changes seen on visual field examination and structural changes seen on optical coherence tomography (OCT) (ie, parapapillary retinal nerve fiber layer changes and inner retinal layer thickness changes at macula). The OCTA measurements also have acceptable test-retest variability and well differentiate glaucomatous from normal eyes. OCTA measurements can be affected by various subject-related, eye-related, and disease-related factors. Vessel density reduction on OCTA reaches a base level (floor) at a more advanced disease stage than the structural changes on OCT and therefore has the potential to monitor progression in eyes with advanced glaucomatous damage. OCTA also adds information about glaucoma patients at risk of faster progression. OCTA, therefore, complements visual field and OCT examinations to diagnose glaucoma, detect progression, and assess risk of progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据