4.7 Article

Comparison of hydrodynamic and ultrasonic cavitation effects on soy protein isolate functionality

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
卷 265, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.109697

关键词

Soy protein isolate; Hydrodynamic cavitation; Ultrasonic cavitation; Functional property

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21466006, 31660473]
  2. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation Program [2016GXNSFAA380105, 2016GXNSFAA380025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, soy protein isolate (SPI) dispersions (3%, w/v) were treated with hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) with a venturi tube (treatment volume: 2 L) and ultrasonic cavitation (UC) (treatment volume: 200 mL and 2 L) under the power of 550 W for 5, 10, 20, and 30 min. The effects of HC and UC treatment on the physicochemical and functional properties of SPI were investigated, and the results were compared to better evaluate the HC effects on food proteins. The results showed that the electrophoretic profile and pH were not affected by UC or HC treatment. The particle size and viscosity of SPI were reduced after UC or HC treatment. Both UC and HC treatment significantly (P < 0.05) increased the surface hydrophobicity. UC treatment at the volume of 2 L did not alter the exposed or total sulfhydryl content; however, UC treatment at the volume of 200 mL and HC treatment altered the exposed sulfhydryl content and decreased the total sulfhydryl content. Moreover, the solubility, emulsifying activity index, emulsion stability index, and foaming capacity were also significantly (P < 0.05) improved; however, foam stability was reduced after UC and HC treatment. Under the conditions investigated in this study, the effect of HC treatment on the physicochemical and functional properties of SPI was more pronounced than that of UC treatment at the volume of 2 L, and was similar to that of UC treatment at the volume of 200 mL. These results suggest that HC could be an effective method to improve the functional properties of food proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据