4.6 Review

Recent developments and applications of QuEChERS based techniques on food samples during pesticide analysis

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2019.103314

关键词

Sample pre-treatment; Food samples; Miniaturization; Pesticides; QuEChERS; Food composition; Food analysis

资金

  1. Research Centre, University of Venda

向作者/读者索取更多资源

QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe) is one of the pre-treatment techniques that has gained tremendous popularity among researchers during pesticide analysis of food and agricultural samples. Since its inception, this method is considered particularly suitable and effective in the extraction of a wide range of compounds. Consequently, most of the methods, developed using QuEChERS involve extracting pesticides and contaminants from various food samples, particularly fruits, vegetables, and other food products. The QuEChERS technique involves two steps: A liquid liquid extraction and dispersive solid-phase extraction clean-up. The samples pre-treated using QuEChERS are clean enough to be analysed using gas or liquid chromatography. There are three common standard methods used during QuEChERS and these are the original QuEChERS, AOAC and the EN methods. In this review, recent developments in the QuEChERS technique are discussed as well as application of these techniques in the analysis of pesticides in food samples. Recently, many modifications of the QuEChERS technique have been effected during analysis of pesticides in food samples and are reviewed in this paper. Such modifications include the use of alkaline hydrolysis during analysis of acidic pesticides, inclusion of the freeze-out step when analysing food samples with high fat content as well as the use of new, effective sorbents such as Z-sep. The applications of the QuEChERS techniques to analyse pesticides in cereal, animal products as well as fruits and vegetables are also reviewed in this paper.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据