4.5 Article

Antihyperuricemic effect of dietary polyphenol sinapic acid commonly present in various edible food plants

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 44, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfbc.13111

关键词

atomic force microscopy; hyperuricemia; potassium oxonate; sinapic acid; xanthine oxidase

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31571801, 31701586]
  2. Beijing Basic Scientific Research Operating Expenses in 2019 [PXM2019014213-000007]
  3. National key research and development program [2018YFD0400403]
  4. Support Project of High-level Teachers in Beijing Municipal Universities in the Period of 13th Five-year Plan [CITTCD201704042]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study was conducted to evaluate the antihyperuricemic effect of sinapic acid (SA). The results showed that SA potently inhibited xanthine oxidase (XOD) in a dose-dependent manner by entering the enzyme active site and thwarting the entrance of the substrate. These results were further confirmed by the quantum chemical descriptors analysis and H-1 NMR titration analysis. The in vivo results indicated that SA not only has the potential to inhibit serum and hepatic XOD (p < .05), but also remarkably lowered serum and urine uric acid levels at 50 and 100 mg/kg bw. Furthermore, SA regulated serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels to normal and lowered inflammation in the renal tubules. Thus, the utilization of SA as an antihyperuricemic agent may have considerable potential for the development of functional foods for the possible treatment of hyperuricemia. Practical applications Plant-derived bioactive compounds have multiple health benefits. The present study assesses the effects of sinapic acid against hyperuricemia. The results suggested that sinapic acid may have a strong protective effect against uric acid-related complications and may be used for the formulation of functional foods. However, further mechanistic studies are required to verify this hypothesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据