4.7 Article

A continuum-scale representation of Ostwald ripening in heterogeneous porous media

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
卷 889, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2020.53

关键词

bubble dynamics; multiphase flow; porous media

资金

  1. Global Climate and Energy Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ostwald ripening is a pore-scale phenomenon that coarsens a dispersed phase until thermodynamic equilibrium. Based on our previous finding that multi-bubble equilibrium is possible and likely in complex porous media, we develop a new continuum-scale model for Ostwald ripening in heterogeneous porous media. In this model, porous media with two different capillary pressure curves are put into contact, allowing only diffusive flow through the aqueous phase to redistribute a trapped gas phase. Results show that Ostwald ripening can increase the gas saturation in one medium while decreasing the gas saturation in the other, even when the gas phase is trapped in pore spaces by capillary forces. We develop an analogous retardation factor to show that the characteristic time for Ostwald ripening is about 105 times slower than a single-phase diffusion problem due to the fact that separate-phase gas requires a much larger amount of mass transfer before equilibrium is established. An approximate solution has been developed to predict the saturation redistribution between the two media. The model has been validated by numerical simulation over a wide range of physical parameters. Millimetre to centimetre-scale systems come to equilibrium in years, ranging up to 10 000 years and longer for metre-scale systems. These findings are particularly relevant for geological CO2 storage, where residual trapping is an important mechanism for immobilizing CO2. Our work demonstrates that Ostwald ripening due to heterogeneity in porous media is slow and on a similar time scale compared to other processes that redistribute trapped CO2 such as convective mixing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据