4.2 Article

Optimizing sludge dewatering with a combined conditioner of Fenton's reagent and cationic surfactant

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 21-30

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2019.08.009

关键词

Sludge dewatering; Fenton reaction; Cationic surfactant-CTAB; Extracellular polymeric substances; Uniform design

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science foundation [2018M642479]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51821006]
  3. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [zj20180141]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enhancing sludge dewatering is of importance in reducing environmental burden and disposal costs. In this work, a cationic surfactant, cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB), was combined with Fenton's reagent for sludge dewatering. Results show that the Fenton-CTAB conditioning significantly promotes the sludge dewatering. Using combined techniques of response surface methodology and uniform design, dosages of Fe2+, H2O2, and CTAB for water content response were optimized to be 89, 276, and 233 mg/g dry solids (DS), respectively. The water content of sludge decreased from 79.0% to 66.8% under the optimal conditions. Compared with cationic polyacrylamide, the Fenton-CTAB system exhibited superior sludge dewatering performance. To gain insights into the mechanisms involved in sludge dewatering, the effects of Fenton-CTAB conditioning on the composition of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and the morphology of the sludge flocs were investigated. The decomposition of EPS into some dissolved organics and the release of proteins in tightly bound EPS facilitated the conversion of bound water to free water and further reduced the water content of sludge cake. After conditioning, morphology of sludge showed aggregation. Overall, the enhanced sludge dewatering by Fenton-CTAB treatment provides an efficient way for management of sewage sludge. (C) 2019 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据