4.7 Article

Phosphate removal from industrial wastewater through in-situ Fe2+ oxidation induced homogenous precipitation: Different oxidation approaches at wide-ranged pH

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 255, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109849

关键词

Phosphate removal; Electro-plating wastewater; Fe2+; Catalytic oxidation; Fenton reaction

资金

  1. Foundation of National Key Laboratory of Human Factors Engineering [SYFD170051808K]
  2. Shenzhen Technology Innovation Support [JSGG20170413152540284]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2018A003348]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphate removal through in-situ Fe2+ oxidation induced homogenous phosphate precipitation has shown its advantages in municipal wastewater treatment. Its feasibility and suitability for phosphate removal in industrial wastewater with wide-range pH variation like electro-plating wastewater were investigated in bench scale experiments using synthetic wastewater and continuous experiment using real wastewater. Bench scale experiments showed that different Fe2+ oxidation approaches worked well for phosphate removal at varied pH conditions. Sole dosing Fe2+ salt with aeration achieved sound phosphate removal at alkaline condition (pH >= 8). At neutral pH (6 < pH < 8), transition metallic ions catalytic oxidation is a suitable alternative. Cu2+ exhibited superior catalytic Fe2+ oxidization over Mn2+, Zn2+, and Ni2+. At acid pH (3.0 < pH <= 6.0), Fenton reaction oxidation (H2O2 = 5 mg/L) showed its efficiency. At their corresponding optimal pH conditions and with Fe2+/P ratio of 1.8, dosing sole Fe2+ salt, Cu2+ catalyzed Fe2+ oxidation, and Fe2+/H2O2 treatments can achieve the TP discharge limit of 0.5 mg/L. In a 30-day continuous experiment using real electro-plating wastewater (pH 4.9-5.5), in both direct Fe2+/H2O2 treatment and Cu2+ catalyzed Fe2+ oxidation treatment after wastewater pH being adjusted to 7 effluent TP met China's discharge requirement 0.5 mg/L.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据